Washington,
D.C. and Seattle rate among “most livable” U.S. citiesThe
District of Columbia (Washington, D.C.) has plenty of cultural
amenities, enough to rank it ahead of Boston and New York in Money
magazine’s best places to live in the eastern United States.
Washington’s top ranking may be a surprise to some people
knowledgeable about the many problems in the nation’s capital, but
Money magazine, in its annual ranking of the nation’s 300 most
livable areas, said that museums were among the many advantages
found in the metropolitan area.
By the magazine’s reckoning, of the nation’s biggest cities,
Norfolk, Virginia represents the finest of the South, Minneapolis is
the mightiest of the Midwest, and Seattle is the best of the West.
Money magazine changed the format for the 12th annual ranking,
listing the top places by region and population size, instead of a
straight 300-place catalog it used in the past. In compiling the
list, Money gathered data on the country’s 300 largest metropolitan
areas, and ranked them according to how the scored on 37 “livability
factors,” including clean water, low crime, clean air, good public
schools, and low property taxes.
The cities were then ranked according to size, metropolitan areas
of 1 million people or more, those with populations of 250,000 to
999,999, and populations of 100,000 to 249,999. Using those
population ground rules, the West’s best were Seattle, Washington,
Boulder/Longmont, Colorado, and Fort Collins, Colorado.
Best places to live in the West
Large (1 million or more)
- Seattle, Washington
- Denver, Colorado
- Los Angeles, California
Medium (250,000 to 999,999)
- Boulder, Colorado
- Tacoma, Washington
- Eugene, Oregon
Small (100,000 to 249,999)
- Fort Collins, Colorado
- San Luis Obispo, California
- Olympia, Washington
|